Consumer contract rights and digital content

Issue:
This pertains to a pair of proposed Directives designed to reduce barriers to the cross-border trade of digital content and also physical goods

Relevant policy:
Proposal for a Directive on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content (pdf)

Proposal for a Directive on certain aspects concerning contracts for the online and other distance sale of goods (pdf)

Consumer contract issues also touch on various European-directed consumer and competition law policies, including the Consumer Rights Directive 2014 and the Consumer Rights Act 2015

Progress and developments:
In November 2016 the European Scrutiny Committee of the House of Commons reviewed Government’s position on cross-border sales within the DSM. The dialogue is long and complicated. The Committee requested the following clarifications by 9 May:

On the proposal [for digital content], we welcome:

a)the direction and focus of the negotiations so far on the question of consumer expectations in relation to “fitness for purpose” and “quality”, leaving damages remedies to regulation at national level and the need to reduce overlaps between this and the proposal on tangible goods (b); and

b)the Government’s focus on obtaining a text which aligns with the Consumer Rights Act and which does not, in the Minister’s words “stifle the innovative UK tech business”.

We note that there appears to be general acceptance now that “free” digital content contracts will be covered by [this] proposal but that Government wants the type of data acting as payment to be closely defined and for practical remedies to reflect reasonable consumer expectations. We agree with the Government that legal clarity on obligations and rights in relation to such contracts will be key.

We look forward to the Minister’s further updates as the negotiations on proposal (a) progress and when they commence on proposal [for physical goods].

In relation to Brexit, we ask the Minister to indicate:

a)when she considers the legislative proposals are likely to be adopted; and

b)the extent to which the UK is likely to want to mirror in its post-Brexit domestic legislation the substance of the legislative proposals where there is a deviation from current UK law; and if so the extent to which this would require further agreement with the EU because it involves reciprocal cross-border rights and obligations.

On 15 March the complicated dialogue continued, and then again on 25 April.

Elsewhere, general digital consumer rights and Brexit were briefly discussed in the Lords on 12 December.